Agent-native Research Knowledge Infrastructure

Zhiway

Let agents see how the literature connects.

Zhiway is not another research-agent application. We build agent-native research knowledge infrastructure and knowledge commercialization capabilities for model providers and research institutions. We focus on the stage before experiments begin. The technology community is working to close dry- and wet-lab loops; but if AI lets one laboratory pursue a hundred directions at once, the scarce decision will no longer be how to run experiments, but which hundred routes deserve to begin.

Start experiments.
Stop betting blind.

2 Live products

Idea Network and Idea Interflowing are live, closing the loop between knowledge environment and research decisions

21 MCP tools

online research tools designed for low reasoning, retrieval, and context cost

3 Pilot labs

Research FDE on site across NLP, materials physics, and materials engineering laboratories

2 Partnership letters

a North China innovation institution and a science-and-engineering university provide pilot and cooperation entry points

Thesis / What is missing

Not another research agent.
An external knowledge environment for agents.

Large models can read papers, but cannot naturally preserve citation structure, field evolution, or research state. What is missing is a trusted, traceable, stateful knowledge environment that updates faster than model training cycles.

Division of responsibility in automated research

Models provide general intelligence — how to search, compare, and continue asking Zhiway provides the boundary of inquiry — trusted sources and persistent exploration state
Knowledge

See how literature connects

Organize authors, concepts, methods, citations, and temporal evolution so an agent can see where a study came from and where it may go next.

Evidence

Progressive source disclosure

Drill from directional judgments into relationships, abstracts, and source evidence, while separating graph-supported, graph-unseen, and graph-blind results.

State

Remember why the path changed

Maintain search history, rejected paths, human corrections, and next-step suggestions outside the model, without repeatedly consuming context to re-prove old conclusions.

Product Matrix

From knowledge to the field, one four-layer loop

Idea Network provides the knowledge environment; Idea Interflowing produces pre-experiment decisions; Research Claw runs inside institutions; Research FDE adapts the system into workflows that can be accepted and procured.

Idea Network Knowledge · Live

Agent-native research knowledge environment

Defines papers, authors, methods, concepts, citation relationships, and research state, then exposes them through MCP. It helps agents see where a study came from, how the field branched, and which boundaries remain unanswered.

Low reasoning, retrieval, and context cost Source evidence · Citation structure · Stateful sessions
Idea Interflowing Decision · Live

Pre-experiment research decision workspace

Turns Idea Network's relationships into inspectable research judgments. Creator identifies structural gaps worth pursuing; Supervisor evaluates novelty, rigor, and reproducibility against a target venue and an explicit evidence path.

Creator · Supervisor Evidence, hypotheses, non-findings, and graph blind spots
Research Claw Experiment · Pilot

Local institutional research-agent environment

Connects an institution's own data, tools, permissions, and workflows inside a local agent environment. Research Claw is the product base; FDE enters the field to identify what each discipline actually needs to preserve and adapt.

Local data · Private deployment · Traceable workflows Start with one concrete research task
Research FDE Field · On site

From field demand to a procurement boundary

FDE is not a fourth software product. It is Zhiway's delivery team inside the lab: reconstructing real workflows, defining data and knowledge boundaries, configuring the Loop / Harness, and proving acceptance criteria on real tasks.

NLP · Materials physics · Materials engineering Field co-building · Acceptance metrics · Procurement scope
Shared Knowledge Layer

One research knowledge environment

Literature structure · Source evidence · Research state · Domain ontology · Agent call traces

Human-in-the-loop

Human corrections become flywheel signals

Not just what was read: acceptance, rejection, rewriting and follow-up questions preserve how research teams judge and redirect

Journey

From shipped products to a shared knowledge layer

A research service first proved demand. SaaS and local-agent products then exposed the same structural bottleneck: research agents need a trusted, stateful knowledge environment. That earned insight became Idea Network and now enters laboratories through Research FDE.

2024 Q4ThesisAgentPlanned
2025.04ThesisAgentV1.0.0 launch
2025.08Idea InterflowingProposed
2025.12Idea InterflowingPrep
2026.01ThesisAgentV5.0.0 launch
2026.01HashMindLaunch
2026.03.05Research ClawLaunch
2026.05Idea InterflowingBuild
2026.06Research Clawv0.7.2
2026.08Idea Network / InterflowingProducts live
2026.08Research FDEEntered three laboratories
See the full evolution timeline →

Idea Network × Idea Interflowing / Live

Help research agents find evidence
and state what remains unknown

Idea Network is a research knowledge environment agents can call directly for literature relationships, source evidence, and stateful research sessions. Idea Interflowing is the pre-experiment research-decision SaaS built on it, organizing research directions, evidence paths, not-found results, and blind spots into an inspectable delivery chain.

① Research-gap mining GAP ANALYSIS ② Frontier forecast FRONTIER FORECAST High-value research gap Cluster A Cluster B Cluster C t₁t₂t₃t₄? ??? Field core Frontier expands over time → Predicted next move

Research-gap mining

Locate the "voids" in the citation network — structural gaps no one has reached — and let agents work out which research question each void corresponds to.

Frontier-breakthrough forecast

Identify a field's research frontier, trace how it has advanced over time, and answer "where is the next breakthrough most likely to appear."

Cross-disciplinary hypotheses

Find inspiration along real academic relationships and generate candidate hypotheses where fields intersect — each traceable back to the original literature.

Idea Creator Live

Start from a research direction and follow connected papers, concepts and citations to find structural gaps worth pursuing. Separate established evidence, refutable hypotheses and open validation work, then deliver a structured research proposal that can be reviewed and executed.

Idea Supervisor Live

Review a paper or completed body of work against target-venue dimensions and expose the evidence path behind every judgment. Explicitly separate graph-confirmed evidence, graph-not-found results and graph blind spots so each score can be challenged and refined.

Science of Science / Trajectory Flywheel

Models can learn how to open the book.
They cannot memorize a continuously moving research boundary once and for all.

Science of Science has traditionally reconstructed discovery from papers, citations and patents after publication. In the agent era, every human acceptance, rejection, rewrite and redirection lets us observe how a direction forms while research is still happening.

01 · PUBLISHED STRUCTURE

Published knowledge provides the structural map

Ontologies, citation relations and temporal evolution show where a direction came from, how it branched, and where current evidence ends.

02 · HUMAN-DIRECTED TRAJECTORY

Human choices add the missing process signal

What an agent queried is only the beginning. Why a researcher accepted, rejected, pursued or abandoned a route is the scarce data behind research judgment.

03 · EVOLVING BOUNDARY

The boundary of inquiry remains outside the model

A model can internalize the skill of open-book research. New papers, evolving relations, not-found boundaries and team judgment trajectories cannot be permanently absorbed by a single training run.

From hindsight to live process

From retrospective statistics to research in motion

Idea Network organizes published knowledge; Creator and Supervisor enter topic selection, proposal formation and evidence review. Together they begin to reveal not only what science has published, but how scientific innovation forms.

Compounding data flywheel

Every call can calibrate the next exploration

With research intent and institutional data protected, MCP calls and human corrections create continuously updated trajectory signals that can improve attention models, gap ranking and boundary judgments.

Field Validation / Research FDE

Letters open the door.
FDE turns demand into a procurement boundary.

Products prove capability online; FDE proves value in the field. We do not begin with “buy an AI platform.” We begin with one task that actually happens every day in a lab, then define data boundaries, acceptance metrics, buyer, and budget.

01

Reconstruct the real workflow

Map agents, literature sources, specialist tools, roles, and critical decision points.

02

Define data and knowledge boundaries

List open and non-open journals, private data, permissions, and local security requirements.

03

Configure Loop / Harness

Build domain ontology and graphs; connect literature sources, specialist tools, and judgment workflows.

04

Prove acceptance and procurement

Run real tasks and define acceptance metrics, buyer, delivery boundary, and budget.

Live & Field Validation

From live products to three laboratories

Idea Network and Idea Interflowing are live; Research Claw is running in pilot labs; Research FDE is already on site in three disciplines.

A provincial university in North ChinaNLP laboratory · FDE on site
A science and engineering university in East ChinaMaterials physics laboratory · FDE on site
An applied university in East ChinaMaterials engineering laboratory · FDE on site

Team

Exactly every capability this mission requires

First-hand research experience, multi-agent engineering, and access to institutional and international markets — a team holding all three at once is itself a scarce asset.

Siyuan Liu

Founder · CEO

  • MSc in CS / AI, University of Southampton; large-model algorithms expert
  • 10+ years deploying AI applications; independently shipped 5 products
  • Led the development of China's first medical LLM and a financial-research LLM

Haonan Zhang

CSO · Chief Strategy Officer

  • Assistant researcher and PhD at Tsinghua's Institute for AI International Governance; Shuimu Scholar
  • Member of the Academy of Management (AOM)
  • 7 papers in international core journals and 4 at top conferences; national gold medal at the Challenge Cup

Yilong Li

Co-Founder · Head of Engineering

  • Tech lead for the Xiangyu product line at 5i5j Group
  • SaaS expert and full-stack Java web engineer
  • Building LLM and agent startups with Siyuan Liu since 2023

Fei Meng

Co-Founder · Head of Operations

  • Honours BEng, University of Adelaide, Australia
  • Project manager at Stantec; five years of full-cycle international consulting delivery
  • Delivered projects totaling over AUD 10M; leads APAC strategic partnerships

Xueqi Zhao

Head of University–Industry–Research Partnerships

  • Digitalization and AI-policy expert at UNIDO
  • Assistant researcher, PhD, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
  • Led national and provincial projects; 15 high-level papers; national gold medal in an innovation & entrepreneurship competition

Jinghui Yin

Head of Investment & Financing Partnerships

  • Assistant researcher, PhD, School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University
  • 10 high-level papers published
  • 5 research reports received high-level endorsement or adoption

With Zhiway's assistance, papers completed and authored by the researchers themselves have been accepted at IJCAI, EMNLP, and AAAI — 3 in total, with a 4th under review. Blind peer review at top conferences is the field's most demanding third-party test.

Let agents see how the literature connects

Use a knowledge environment to support pre-experiment decisions, then bring it into institutions through Research Claw and Research FDE so every judgment has evidence and every redirection preserves state.

Start experiments without betting blind.

Knowledge

Research knowledge environment

Decision

Pre-experiment research decisions

Field

Institutional field delivery

Contact

Walk with us

Whether you're a researcher, an institution, or simply someone who cares about AI for Science — we'd love to hear from you.

contact@zhiway.com.cn